GENAIWIKI

Claude 3 Sonnet

Legacy

Claude 3 Sonnet balanced cost and capability in the Claude 3 generation—useful for general assistants and document workflows where Opus was unnecessary.

Best for:Stable internal bots with predictable costCost tier:
Compared to:Claude 3.5 HaikuReplaces:Claude 3 Haiku

LLM · Release · See vendor

general-purposelegacy

Updated 1 day ago · Verified Apr 2026 · Score 78

Decision summary

Why teams reach for it, where it fits, and what to watch for — before you dive into specs.

Why teams choose it

  • Migration to 3.5 Sonnet is common—run parallel evals before cutover.
  • Bedrock model IDs differ from direct API strings.

Best use cases

  • Use this when stable internal bots with predictable cost
  • Use this when document summarization at scale

Tradeoffs

  • Weaker than 3.5 Sonnet on many coding tasks—test before routing traffic.
  • Lifecycle status depends on Anthropic announcements.

Technical details

Modalities, benchmarks, and release context.

Modalities

What goes in and what comes out.

Inputs
text, image
Outputs
text
Capabilities
general chat, analysis
Release: ·License: See vendor

Benchmarks snapshot

Structured JSON for reproducible comparisons.

No benchmark data yet — see comparisons for relative performance.

Family lineup

Explore other versions in this family after you have the headline on this model.

Continue exploring

A short set of comparisons, nearby models, and links to go deeper — without repeating the same paths.

This page is based on publicly available documentation, benchmarks, and real-world usage patterns. Last reviewed for accuracy recently.