GENAIWIKI

o1-mini

Current

A smaller, faster o1-class model for STEM-style reasoning where full o1 latency or cost is prohibitive.

Best for:STEM tutoring with budget limitsCost tier:
Compared to:Replaces:

Reasoning LLM · Release · See vendor

reasoningcost

Updated 1 day ago · Verified Apr 2026 · Score 78

Decision summary

Why teams reach for it, where it fits, and what to watch for — before you dive into specs.

Why teams choose it

  • Good middle tier in routing: escalate failures to o1 or GPT-4o.
  • Validate on your own math/code suite—aggregate benchmarks are only directional.

Best use cases

  • Use this when sTEM tutoring with budget limits
  • Use this when automated grading assistance

Tradeoffs

  • Can still be slower than non-reasoning chat models.
  • May underperform o1 on hardest tasks—keep escalation paths.

Technical details

Modalities, benchmarks, and release context.

Modalities

What goes in and what comes out.

Inputs
text
Outputs
text
Capabilities
reasoning, math
Release: ·License: See vendor

Benchmarks snapshot

Structured JSON for reproducible comparisons.

No benchmark data yet — see comparisons for relative performance.

Continue exploring

A short set of comparisons, nearby models, and links to go deeper — without repeating the same paths.

This page is based on publicly available documentation, benchmarks, and real-world usage patterns. Last reviewed for accuracy recently.